Anastasia Motyashova, the ex-wife of former UFC fighter Fransimar Barroso, has come forward with serious allegations against her former husband. She claims Barroso physically abused her and is not paying child support for their three-year-old son. Motyashova alleges that Barroso is fighting for free at the MMA Series 94 tournament to avoid paying alimony and debts from their joint business. She reportedly fears for her life and safety and has asked for the story to be publicized. The post questions why MMA Series organizers would work with Barroso given these allegations.
Anastasia Motyashova, the former wife of ex-UFC fighter Fransimar Barroso, has publicly alleged that Barroso physically abused her during their relationship and has failed to pay child support for their three-year-old son.
Motyashova came forward with the accusations and asked for the story to be shared widely, stating she fears for her personal safety. Among her claims is the allegation that Barroso is competing at the MMA Series 94 tournament without compensation, a move she suggests is designed to shield income from alimony obligations and debts stemming from their jointly operated business.
The allegations raise questions about the MMA Series organization's decision to book Barroso given the circumstances Motyashova has outlined. Whether the promotion was aware of the accusations at the time of signing has not been addressed in available reporting.
Why it matters
- The allegations involve serious claims of domestic abuse and financial misconduct against a former UFC-level competitor
- Motyashova contends that competing without pay may be a deliberate strategy to evade legal financial obligations, including child support
- The situation puts pressure on MMA Series organizers to respond publicly to the claims surrounding one of their participating fighters
- The case highlights broader questions about how combat sports promotions vet and handle fighters facing serious off-canvas legal and personal allegations
Barroso's participation at MMA Series 94 remains the immediate focal point, with Motyashova's public appeal drawing attention to what she describes as an ongoing threat to her wellbeing. No response from Barroso or the promotion has been reported at this stage.
