A post-fight analysis of Jack Della Maddalena versus Carlos Prates identifies several critical tactical mistakes by the Australian. Maddalena relied heavily on a boxing guard for defense, approximately 90% of the time, which proved ineffective against Prates's diverse striking arsenal of kicks, elbows, knees, and punches. He fought predominantly in southpaw stance despite his left leg being compromised in his previous fight against Islam Makhachev, and when he switched to orthodox, Prates targeted his left side with middle kicks. Maddalena's best chance would have been aggressive forward pressure and cage control, but he lacked the speed and aggression needed, and Prates showed no fear. The analyst concludes that regardless of preparation, Prates would have likely won due to his supreme confidence, versatility, and ability to strike effectively from all angles. The piece also discusses potential implications for a future Makhachev versus Prates matchup.
