Breakdown: Maddalena vs Prates tactical analysis and Makhachev matchup preview

A detailed analysis reveals Jack Maddalena performed about 90% of his defensive actions using a boxing block, which proved inadequate against Carlos Prates' diverse striking arsenal of kicks, elbows, knees, and punches. Maddalena spent much of the fight in a southpaw stance despite needing more orthodox preparation, and Prates punished his left side with middle kicks. Maddalena's best chance would have been aggressive pressure, but he lacked the speed and aggression needed, while Prates showed complete confidence and versatility. The analysis concludes Prates would have won regardless of Maddalena's approach. Looking ahead to a potential Islam Makhachev matchup, the post notes that as a southpaw, Makhachev would be vulnerable to Prates' devastating leg kicks that have compromised previous southpaw opponents. However, Makhachev's high-level striking and grappling could change the dynamic if he can take Prates down and wear him out. The UFC must decide whether to book Prates versus Michael Morales to determine a clear contender.