Detailed analysis reveals Makhachev vs Prates presents legitimate dangers for champion

An extensive breakdown of Carlos Prates's recent victory over Jack Della Maddalena identified key tactical elements and implications for a potential Islam Makhachev matchup. The analysis noted that Maddalena relied too heavily on boxing blocks against Prates's diverse striking arsenal of kicks, elbows, knees and punches, and spent too much time in southpaw stance despite having his left leg targeted successfully. Maddalena's chance was to be the aggressive aggressor forcing Prates backward against the cage, but he lacked the speed and was too cautious, especially after absorbing a knee. The post concluded Prates would have won regardless of Maddalena's approach due to his belief, versatility, and being a hybrid of Alex Pereira and Anderson Silva. For Makhachev, the analysis identifies genuine dangers: Prates destroys southpaws' right legs with 4-5 leg kicks, can knockout with 10-15, and threatens with knees during entries. However, Makhachev is himself a high-level striker who disguises takedowns well, and ground control could diminish Prates's confidence. The UFC faces a decision whether to have Prates fight Diego Moraes first or save him for Makhachev.